- PLoS One to. 2022; 17(6): e0270103. »
- Decision Page 0
2022; 17 (6) : e0270103. Published on line 2022 Jun 29. doi: /record.pone.0270103.r001 Johnson Chun-Play Cheung, Section Editor Copyright laws © 2022 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung
This really is an unbarred accessibility post marketed beneath the terms of brand new Creative Commons Attribution Licenses, and that it allows open-ended explore, shipping, and you will reproduction in any average, given the initial author and you will resource are paid.
If you would like and also make changes for the monetary revelation, please were your own upgraded report in your employment cover letter
Once careful consideration, we think this keeps quality but cannot fully meet PLOS Your publication conditions whilst currently really stands. Hence, i ask one to fill in a revised kind of the new manuscript that address contact information the affairs increased inside remark procedure.
Delight fill out the changed manuscript of the . If you will you desire additional time than which to complete the changes, excite answer it content otherwise contact this new journal work environment in the As you prepare to submit the posting, log on to and pick the new ‘Submissions In need of Revision’ folder in order to to track down their manuscript file.
An effective rebuttal letter you to responds every single point elevated from the instructional publisher and you will reviewer(s). You should upload so it letter while the another document branded ‘Response to help you Reviewers’.
Reasonable-upwards content of your manuscript one to features changes built to this new fresh type. You ought to publish this because the a different sort of document branded ‘Revised Manuscript having Song Changes’.
An enthusiastic unmarked kind of your own modified paper without monitored alter. You ought to publish so it since the a special document labeled ‘Manuscript’.
In the event that applicable, it is recommended that you deposit your own laboratory protocols into enhance the reproducibility of one’s overall performance. assigns your own method a unique identifier (DOI) as a result it is quoted by themselves afterwards. Getting recommendations find: On the other hand, PLOS You to also provides a choice for posting fellow-examined Research Protocol stuff, which determine standards organized toward . Find out more information on revealing standards on
step 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS One’s style standards, plus the individuals to own file naming. The PLOS You to concept layouts is present on
“So it enterprise try backed by a subjects from Offense Act (VOCA) federal violation-by way of offer awarded to operate of Texas Governor (OOG) Youngster Sex Trafficking Class and you can Traffick911. The recruit of the process – Traffick911 – features aided into the study build and you will investigation collection package revealed contained in this process. Traffick911 directors features approved the fresh protocol demonstrated here. The latest viewpoints, conclusions, results, and you can information expressed inside guide are the ones of your own writer(s) and do not always reflect the newest views of the VOCA, OOG, otherwise Traffick911.
Please county what part brand new funders took regarding the studies. If for example the funders didn’t come with character, please county: “”The new funders didn’t come with character into the analysis construction, investigation range and you may analysis, decision to share, or preparing of one’s manuscript.””
Delight include that it amended Part of Funder statement on the shelter letter; we shall replace the on the web submitting means on your behalf.
3. Your stability report is to only are available in the methods section of your own manuscript. In case your ethics report is written in just about any point aside from the Tips, delight erase they regarding another part.
Reviewer #1: Which method describes an important comparison regarding an enthusiastic anti-sex trafficking system, and ensuing analyses will likely end up being a meaningful addition with the community
p2: The fresh statistic getting 300,000 at-chance childhood are going to be made clear, as the bounds which childhood are considered on the line inside the which pass aren’t the same since the men and women used up later into the the methods to determine and therefore everyone is “on the line” and you may entitled to the application form. What should be modified during these basic paragraphs along with the ways making it clear on the viewer that the difference is present.